2000
#6,442
National surname rank
First available Census row
An Old English surname referring to a person from the Isle of Wight or a brave warrior.
According to the 2020 US Census Bureau surname tables, roughly 5,524 Americans carry the last name Wight. That puts it at #6,733 in the national surname ranking, appearing at a frequency of 1.61 per 100,000 people (about 1 in 62,048 residents).
This page is the full Name Census profile for the Wight surname. You will find the Census Bureau frequency data, a multi-census history view, an ancestry and ethnicity breakdown based on self-reported demographics, the name's meaning and origin where available, and answers to the most common questions people ask about this surname.
For British records, Name Census UK has a British surname profile for Wight with 1881 census detail, origin facts and modern UK distribution where available.
Bearers in the US
5.5K
1 in 62,048
Census rank
#6,733
2020 decennial data
Per 100,000
1.6
Frequency rate
Recorded bearers
4.8K
rare in the US
Popularity narrative
The Census Bureau recorded 4,817 bearers of the surname Wight in its 2020 decennial surname file. At a rate of 1.61 per 100,000 residents, it holds the 6733rd position in the national surname ranking.
Among Census respondents with the surname Wight, the largest self-reported group is White at 88.3%. The next largest groups are Two or More Races (4.6%) and Hispanic (3.1%).
Origin
The surname WIGHT originated in England during the Anglo-Saxon period, deriving from the Old English word "wiht," meaning a living creature or a person. It was initially used as a descriptive name, referring to a person or family associated with a specific region or location known as "the Wight" or "the Isle of Wight."
The Isle of Wight, located off the southern coast of England, was a significant place during the Anglo-Saxon era, and many early records mention individuals with the surname WIGHT who were connected to this area. The earliest known reference to the name appears in the Domesday Book of 1086, where it is recorded as "Wiht."
One of the earliest recorded individuals with the surname WIGHT was William Wight, who lived in Lincolnshire, England, in the 13th century. Another notable bearer of the name was John Wight, a wealthy merchant and landowner in Essex, England, who lived from 1520 to 1590.
In the 16th century, the name WIGHT was also associated with the town of Wight in Yorkshire, England. This connection is evident in the records of Thomas Wight, a landowner and prominent figure in the area, who lived from 1540 to 1612.
The surname WIGHT was not limited to England alone. In Scotland, there was a notable family of the name Wight that held lands in the Scottish Borders region. One of the most famous members of this family was Sir Alexander Wight (1590-1662), a Scottish military commander who fought in the Thirty Years' War and the Wars of the Three Kingdoms.
Another prominent individual with the surname WIGHT was Thomas Wight (1772-1853), a Scottish botanist and surgeon who made significant contributions to the study of Indian flora. He served as the Superintendent of the East India Company's Botanical Garden in Calcutta (now Kolkata) and published several works on Indian plants.
In the United States, one of the earliest recorded bearers of the surname WIGHT was John Wight, who was born in England in 1596 and later emigrated to Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1638. He became a prominent figure in the colony and served as a deputy to the General Court of Massachusetts.
Over the centuries, the surname WIGHT has maintained its connection to the Isle of Wight and other places bearing similar names, such as the town of Wight in Yorkshire. While the name has evolved in spelling and pronunciation, its origins can be traced back to the Anglo-Saxon period, reflecting the linguistic and cultural heritage of England.
Demographics
Among Census respondents with the surname Wight, the largest self-reported group is White at 88.3%. The next largest groups are Two or More Races (4.6%) and Hispanic (3.1%).
The bar chart below shows how Wight bearers described their own race and ethnicity on the 2020 Census form. The Census Bureau groups responses into six broad categories: White, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Asian and Pacific Islander, American Indian and Alaska Native, and Two or More Races. When a category has too few respondents for a given surname, the Bureau suppresses the figure to protect individual privacy, which is why some names show fewer than six slices.
Percentages are shown for every Census year so the breakdown stays comparable over time. When the source file also includes raw headcounts, Name Census shows those alongside the percentages in the legend.
Keep in mind that these are self-reported numbers. A person's surname does not determine their race or ethnicity, and the distribution you see here reflects the specific population who happened to carry the Wight surname at the time of the 2020 Census, not any inherent property of the name itself.
Timeline
Wight appears in 3 published Census surname files: 2000, 2010, 2020. The cards below show how the name's rank and bearer count changed across each release.
2000
National surname rank
First available Census row
2010
National surname rank
+42 bearers (+0.9%)
2020
National surname rank
-87 bearers (-1.8%)
| Year | Rank | Count | Per 100K | Count change | Rank change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | #6,442 | 4,862 | 1.80 | First available Census row | First available Census row |
| 2010 | #6,863 | 4,904 | 1.66 | +42 bearers (+0.9%) | Down 421 places |
| 2020 | #6,733 | 4,817 | 1.61 | -87 bearers (-1.8%) | Up 130 places |
For 2020, the Census Bureau published race and Hispanic-origin columns as counts rather than percentages. Name Census converts those counts back into shares so the ancestry section stays comparable with the older surname files.
Year on year
How has the Wight surname changed between Census years? The chart shows bearer count side by side, and the table compares rank, count, and frequency.
Census year comparison
| Metric | 2010 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | #6,863 | #6,733 | 1.9% |
| Count | 4,904 | 4,817 | -1.8% |
| Per 100K | 1.66 | 1.61 | -2.9% |
Between the 2010 and 2020 Census, the number of Wight bearers went from 4,904 to 4,817 (-1.8% change). The surname moved up 130 positions in the national ranking, going from #6,863 to #6,733.
FAQ
Name Census estimates that about 5,524 living Americans carry the surname Wight. Using the current population baseline, that works out to roughly 1 in 62,048 residents.
Wight ranks #6,733 in the 2020 Census surname tables and is classified on this site as "Rare." The Census recorded the name at a frequency of 1.61 per 100,000 residents, which is about 2 people out of every 100,000.
The raw 2020 Census file counted 4,817 people with the surname Wight. That is different from the site's living-bearer estimate (5,524), which projects the surname's present-day count by applying the Census frequency rate to the current U.S. population.
It is the Census Bureau's normalized frequency measure. A rate of 1.61 per 100,000 means that if you picked a random group of 100,000 U.S. residents, you would expect about 2 of them to have the surname Wight.
Between 2010 and 2020, the surname Wight went from 4,904 recorded bearers to 4,817. That is a decrease of 87 (-1.8%). In the national ranking it rose from #6,863 to #6,733.
Among Census respondents with the surname Wight, the largest self-reported group is White at 88.3%. The next largest groups are Two or More Races (4.6%) and Hispanic (3.1%). These figures come from the 2020 Census Bureau surname tables, based on how respondents described their own race and ethnicity.
White is the largest self-reported group for the surname Wight in the 2020 Census, accounting for 88.3% (4,253 people in the source table).
Wight appears across multiple self-reported groups in the Census data. The largest shares in the 2020 file are White (88.3%), Two or More Races (4.6%), Hispanic (3.1%). For 2020, the source file also published raw headcounts for each group, which is why this page can show both percentages and counts in the ancestry section.
Yes. This page is using the latest surname file currently loaded on Name Census, which is 2020. The historical section above also keeps any older Census surname entries we have for Wight (2000, 2010, 2020).
No. The Census Bureau only publishes surnames that appeared at least 100 times in a given decennial Census. That means very rare surnames are excluded entirely, and a surname can appear in one Census release but disappear from a later one if it falls below the reporting threshold.
There are two main reasons: rounding and suppression. The Census Bureau rounds published values, and it may suppress very small cells to protect privacy. For 2020, the Bureau also published raw group counts rather than direct percentages, so Name Census converts those counts back into shares for comparability across census years.
An Old English surname referring to a person from the Isle of Wight or a brave warrior. The fuller origin note on this page goes into more detail.
All surname statistics on Name Census are drawn from the US Census Bureau's decennial surname frequency tables. These files list every surname that appeared 100 or more times in the 2020 Census, along with a count, a per-100,000 rate, and a self-reported demographic breakdown. You can read the full explanation on our methodology page.
For surnames, Name Census does not age cohorts the way it does for first names. Instead, it takes the Census Bureau's published frequency for Wight (1.61 per 100,000) and applies that rate to the current U.S. resident population to estimate how many living Americans have the surname today.
You can see how many Americans have the surname Wight on our sister site HowManyOfMe.org — same data roots, lighter UI.